California Special Districts. Two mandates, one website.

Water, fire, transit, park, library, healthcare and utility districts — plus the joint powers authorities they form — run on small teams with no in-house web staff and a statutory obligation to publish. We build and remediate those sites to satisfy SB 929 and the ADA Title II standard together, in one project.

We grow your business with

CROturn traffic into leads
SEOrank & get found
GEOwin generative search
AEOget cited by AI answers

The situation

Special districts carry both obligations at once, and usually with no web staff

A California special district sits at an unusual intersection. Since January 1, 2020, every independent special district has been required by SB 929 to maintain a website and post a specific set of items on it. Separately, as a public entity, the district is covered by the Justice Department's ADA Title II web rule, which requires web content and mobile apps to conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Special district governments fall in the later compliance cohort: April 26, 2028.

Neither obligation comes with staff. Districts are small by design — a general manager, a board clerk, a handful of operations people — and the website is usually somebody's fourth responsibility. It was often set up quickly in 2019 to clear the SB 929 deadline, by whoever was available, on whatever platform was cheapest. Six years later it is posting agendas, and it is almost certainly not accessible.

That combination is why districts are the most under-served buyer in California local government. The contracts are small, frequent and repeatable, so the large civic-web vendors barely compete for them. Meanwhile the district has a hard accessibility deadline, a statutory publishing obligation it cannot pause, and nobody in the building who can evaluate a remediation quote. We wrote up what a district should actually budget for this for exactly that reader.

Who this is for

Districts and joint powers authorities

Different services, the same shape of problem — statutory publishing duties, a small team, and an accessibility deadline that is not going to move again.

💧

Water, sewer and utility districts

Rate notices, Prop 218 hearings, outage and conservation information, service applications, and consumer confidence reports that have to be findable and readable on a phone.

🚒

Fire protection districts

Emergency and evacuation information that has to publish fast and read clearly under stress, alongside routine board business, budgets and hiring.

🚌

Transit agencies

Schedules, fares, service alerts, rider notices and Title VI material — the content most likely to be published as an inaccessible PDF, and most consequential when it is.

🌳

Park, recreation and library districts

Program registration, facility reservations, hours and closures, and catalog or event systems that are usually third-party embeds with accessibility problems of their own.

🏥

Healthcare and hospital districts

Board governance and public meeting material alongside patient-facing information, where plain language and translation matter most.

Joint powers authorities

JPAs formed by member agencies — risk pools, transit and waste authorities, financing authorities — with their own board, their own Brown Act duties, and often no website budget of their own.

SB 929

What an independent special district has to post

SB 929 applies to independent districts, not to dependent districts governed by a city or county board. A district that cannot comply may claim a hardship, but only by resolution, adopted in a public meeting, with evidence, renewed annually.

District contact information
The most recent agenda, posted at least 72 hours ahead of each regular meeting
The district's Financial Transaction Report to the State Controller, or a link to it
The district's Board and Staff Compensation Report to the State Controller, or a link to it
The Enterprise System Catalog required by SB 272
In practice, also: board members, meeting archives, budgets and the district's service area

ADA Title II

Your deadline is April 26, 2028 — and posting compliance is where sites fail

Special district governments are named in the rule as part of the later cohort, so the deadline is April 26, 2028 regardless of the population you serve. Those dates are the extended ones. The Justice Department published an interim final rule on April 20, 2026 that moved both compliance dates back by a year; a great deal of published guidance still quotes the original April 2026 and April 2027 dates. If a vendor is quoting you a 2026 deadline, they are working from stale information.

The standard is WCAG 2.1 Level AA. For a district site, the failures are predictable and they cluster on exactly the content SB 929 requires you to publish. Agendas and minutes go up as scanned PDFs with no text layer, which are unreadable to a screen reader and unsearchable to everyone. Board packets are image-only. Rate tables are posted as pictures of tables. Meeting videos have automatic captions nobody has corrected. The agenda-posting duty and the accessibility duty land on the same documents, which is why we treat them as one workstream instead of two projects. If your district is part of a joint powers authority, note that the JPA carries its own obligation separately from yours.

There is also a scope trap worth naming early. The rule covers web content and mobile apps that a public entity provides or makes available — which includes the third-party systems you have embedded. Agenda management, permit and payment portals, job boards, reservation systems and video streaming are frequently the least accessible things on a district website, and they are the parts a redesign alone does not fix. We audit those alongside your own pages and tell you which vendors need to be pushed and which need to be replaced.

The work

What we actually do for a district

An audit of the current site against WCAG 2.1 AA, written so a board can read it and a vendor cannot argue with it
Remediation of published documents — or replacing them with accessible web pages, which is usually cheaper and more usable than fixing the PDF
An agenda and minutes archive that keeps every existing URL, so past postings do not stop resolving
SB 929 postings placed where an auditor and a resident can both find them
Templates the board clerk can publish into without breaking accessibility
Accessibility of the third-party systems you embed, assessed and escalated to those vendors in writing
Keyboard and screen-reader testing before launch, not an overlay widget bolted on afterward
A written handover, so the next clerk is not dependent on us

Procurement

How a district actually buys this

Most districts can award this without a full RFP. We will tell you honestly which path yours is on.

1

Send the site, or the solicitation

If you have an RFP, send it with any addenda and the scoring rubric. If you do not, send the URL of your current site — that is enough to start.

2

Fit review, two business days

We read it properly and tell you whether we are bidding. If we are not, we say why.

3

A findings document your board can read

What is non-compliant, what it affects, what it costs to fix, and what can wait. Written to be attached to a board packet.

4

Fixed-price proposal

In your required format, against your rubric, with named staff, a real timeline and references from public agencies.

5

Build, test, hand over

Reviewable stages, keyboard and screen-reader passes before launch, then documentation and training for the staff you actually have.

Questions

Questions from district staff and boards

Is our deadline 2027 or 2028?
Special district governments are in the later cohort, so April 26, 2028. Both dates moved back a year in the Justice Department's April 2026 interim final rule — the original dates were April 2026 and April 2027, and a lot of guidance still quotes those. If your population is under 50,000 but you are a city rather than a district, you are also in the 2028 cohort. A city or county serving 50,000 or more is in the April 26, 2027 cohort.
We are a dependent district. Does SB 929 apply to us?
No. SB 929 applies to independent special districts. If your board is the city council or the county board of supervisors, you are dependent and the SB 929 posting requirements do not attach to you — but ADA Title II still does, because you are still a public entity.
Can we just add an accessibility widget?
No, and we would advise against paying for one. Overlay widgets do not bring a site into WCAG 2.1 AA conformance, they do not fix an inaccessible PDF, and their presence has not prevented complaints. The rule is about the content itself.
Do we have to remediate twenty years of archived minutes?
This is the question every district asks and it deserves a real answer rather than a sales one. The rule contains limited exceptions, including one for certain archived content — but the exception is narrower than districts hope and it turns on specifics we would need to look at with you. Our practical advice is to prioritize what the public actually requests and what remains legally operative, and to document the reasoning either way.
We are a JPA. Whose obligation is this?
A joint powers authority is its own public entity with its own board, so it carries its own Title II obligation — it does not inherit compliance from its member agencies. In practice JPAs are frequently missed for exactly that reason: everyone assumes a member agency owns the website.
What does this cost?
It depends on how much of the site is documents and how many third-party systems are embedded, which is why we start with an audit rather than a number. We publish honest ranges for public-sector work in our budget guide, and the audit is priced and delivered independently of any build, so you can take the findings to another vendor if you want.

Project Managers who will work with you on your project!

David Geder
David Geder
Irina Shvaya
Irina Shvaya
Benjamin Gunther
Benjamin Gunther
Jeanette Mordvinov
Jeanette Mordvinov
Mark Shvaya
Mark Shvaya

Wondering what this costs? Every service has published pricing — no discovery call required to see it.

View pricing

Putting a district website out to bid?

Send us the solicitation, or just the URL of your current site. We will read it properly and tell you where you stand against both SB 929 and WCAG 2.1 AA.

Book a Strategy Call →