Municipal Website Design. For the people who live there.

City, county and special-district sites carry the everyday business of local government: notices, agendas, permits, utility payments, park hours and the answers residents need before they pick up the phone. We build them to be accessible, scannable, and maintainable by a small team with other jobs to do.

We grow your business with

CROturn traffic into leads
SEOrank & get found
GEOwin generative search
AEOget cited by AI answers

The problem

Local government sites fail in predictable ways

The archive breaks. A redesign moves every URL, and a decade of agendas, minutes and legal notices stops resolving — which is both a public-records problem and the fastest way to lose whatever search visibility the site had.

The documents become unfindable. Agendas and minutes get posted as PDFs into a list that grows until nobody can locate the meeting they need, and none of them are accessible to a screen-reader user.

And the site decays. A vendor launches it, the one staff member who understood the CMS leaves, and three years later nobody can update the homepage without a support ticket. Each of those is a design and documentation decision, not bad luck. For state and local government, the ADA Title II rule names WCAG 2.1 AA specifically, with staged compliance dates — a site built to 2.2 AA clears it.

Who we serve

Local government, in its actual shapes

Different mandates, the same underlying requirement — accessible, understandable, maintainable.

🏙️

Cities and towns

Resident services, department sites, permits and licensing, parks and recreation, and the notices that have to be posted on time and stay posted.

Counties

Larger department structures with many publishers, elections and records functions, and public-health or social-service content that has to be clear under pressure.

💧

Special districts

Water, fire, transit, parks and utility districts — small teams, statutory notice obligations, and often no in-house web staff at all.

🏘️

Housing and redevelopment authorities

Application flows, eligibility rules and waitlist information where plain language and translation are the difference between a resident applying correctly or not at all.

The build

What a municipal site has to get right

Every archived notice, agenda and minute keeps its URL through the migration
Meeting materials structured and searchable, not dumped into an ever-growing PDF list
WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, verified with keyboard and screen-reader passes before launch
Plain-language service pages a resident can scan on a phone in thirty seconds
Translation for the languages actually spoken in the jurisdiction
Departmental editing that stays consistent without routing every change through one person
Emergency and alert content that can be published fast and read clearly
A written handover so the next staff member is not dependent on the vendor

Process

From solicitation to award

A predictable path that fits how public organizations actually have to buy.

1

Submit the solicitation

Upload your RFP, RFQ or scope of work, with addenda and evaluation criteria if you have them.

2

Fit review, two business days

We read it properly and tell you whether we are bidding. If we are not, we say why.

3

Clarification call

Scope, constraints, accessibility obligations, existing systems, and what has gone wrong before. Skipped if your process does not permit contact.

4

Written proposal

In your required format and against your scoring rubric, with fixed pricing, a real timeline, named staff and references.

5

Award, kickoff and handover

Discovery, build in reviewable stages, accessibility tested before launch, and documentation and training at the end.

Questions

Questions from city and county teams

Can you preserve our agenda and minutes archive?
Yes, and we treat it as a requirement rather than a nice-to-have. Every existing URL is mapped before launch so archived materials keep resolving for residents, reporters and anyone who linked to them.
Our meeting documents are all PDFs. Is that a problem?
Often, yes. PDFs are frequently inaccessible and hard to search. We will tell you which documents should be remediated and which are better published as web pages, which is usually cheaper and more usable than fixing the PDF.
We have no in-house web staff. Can we still maintain this?
That is the case we design for. Editing models are built around the staff you actually have, and ongoing maintenance covers patching, backups and monitoring under a named owner.
Do you handle translation?
Yes, for the languages your community actually uses. We will be direct about the trade-offs between machine translation and human translation, because the difference matters most on exactly the pages where accuracy is legally significant.
What about accessibility complaints on our current site?
We can audit the existing site and hand you the findings independently of any build work, so you have evidence of what needs fixing and what it will cost. See Section 508 compliance.

Project Managers who will work with you on your project!

David Geder
David Geder
Irina Shvaya
Irina Shvaya
Benjamin Gunther
Benjamin Gunther
Jeanette Mordvinov
Jeanette Mordvinov
Mark Shvaya
Mark Shvaya

Putting a city or county site out to bid?

Send us the solicitation and we will read it properly — scope, accessibility obligations, existing systems, and what went wrong with the last vendor.

Book a Strategy Call →