This article is part of our Industry Software Guides: the website platforms, forms and booking tools practices and contractors use, with prices checked on vendor pages. Want to know where your site stands? Get a free 20–30 page website audit within 24 hours.
0 entries
For most small and mid-size law firms, self-hosted WordPress is the best website platform because you own every file, you can move hosts at will, and it handles hundreds of practice-area pages without per-item limits. If your firm wants a done-for-you site and will trade some control for convenience, a legal-specific platform such as Justia Elevate or LawLytics is the practical second choice.
The trap to avoid is not a bad builder. It is a contract that keeps your content, your domain or your design when you leave.
Pick the platform you can leave: ownership and portability matter more than templates for a law firm website.
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price (billing) | Key limit |
|---|---|---|---|
 WordPress (self-hosted) | Firms that want full ownership and room to grow | Software is open source; managed hosting from $28/mo billed annually (WP Engine Essential) | You or a developer handle updates and security |
 Webflow | Design-led firms with an in-house marketer | $15/mo billed yearly (Basic, no CMS); $25/mo billed yearly (Premium, with CMS) | CMS item caps; per-site and per-seat pricing adds up |
 Justia Elevate | Firms that want a legal-specific WordPress build plus a free directory profile | From $82.50/mo paid annually | Price depends on firm size; quote via calculator |
 LawLytics | Solo and small firms that want an AI-assisted legal site they can edit | $99/mo month-to-month (Starter, up to 10 pages) | Page caps by plan; design rights stay with LawLytics |
 Squarespace | Solo lawyers who need a clean site fast | $19/mo billed annually (Basic) | Basic omits code injection; limited for large content libraries |
| JurisPage (Juris Digital) | Growing firms that want design plus local SEO with no setup fee | Not published | 24-month term |
 Scorpion and FindLaw | Firms buying a full managed marketing program | Not published | Pricing and contract terms only by quote |
 Wix | DIY sites on a small budget | Varies by region; see Wix plans page | Lower-tier plans have small storage and few collaborators |
Prices checked on vendor pricing pages on 2 November 2026.
How we chose
We compared platforms against what a law firm website has to do, not what a generic small business site needs:
- Ownership and exit terms. Can you export your content, keep your domain and move the site if you change vendors?
- Content scale. Practice-area pages, location pages, attorney bios and a blog can run to hundreds of pages. Plan limits on pages or CMS items matter.
- Intake. Contact forms, chat and call handling that route leads quickly. See our guide to law firm lead response and intake.
- Advertising-rule support. Room for disclaimers, attorney names, office contact details and certification wording. The ABA's model rules are covered below.
- Total cost. Monthly fees, annual commitments, setup or import fees and minimum terms.
- Published pricing. Vendors that publish prices score higher on transparency. Quote-only vendors are included but flagged.
Every price and feature below was checked against the vendor's own pricing or product page on 2 November 2026. eSEOspace's view appears only in "Our take."
A quick note on lawyer advertising rules
Your website is lawyer advertising, whichever platform you choose. Under ABA Model Rule 7.1, a lawyer "shall not make a false or misleading communication" about the lawyer's services. Model Rule 7.2 requires the name and contact information of at least one responsible lawyer or firm, and limits when you can say you are a certified specialist.
The ABA comment to Rule 7.3 says a communication directed to the general public, such as a website, is not a solicitation. These are model rules: each state adopts its own version, and state rules vary. Check your state bar's rules, and read our guide to lawyer advertising rules for websites. This is not legal advice.
1. WordPress (self-hosted): best overall for ownership and scale
- Best for: Firms of any size that want to own the site outright and grow content over years.
- Price: The WordPress software is open source under the GPL, so there is no license fee. You pay for hosting, a theme or custom design and any premium plugins. Managed hosting from WP Engine starts at $28/mo billed annually on the Essential plan.
WordPress gives a law firm what most builders cannot: the four GPL freedoms, including the freedom to run, study, change and redistribute the software. In practice that means your site is a set of files and a database you can move to any host. Nothing about your practice-area library is tied to one vendor.
It also scales. Firms with dozens of practice areas, city pages and a long blog do not hit a CMS item cap. Justia (below) builds its legal website platform on WordPress.
Where it falls short:
- You, your developer or your host must keep core, theme and plugins updated. Skipped updates are a security risk.
- Quality varies widely. A cheap theme with a page builder can be slow on mobile. See law firm website speed and mobile.
- There is no built-in support line unless your host provides one.
Our take: For a firm planning to publish steadily for years, WordPress on good managed hosting is the safest long-term bet. If you hire help, our list of WordPress developers for law firms is a starting point.
2. Webflow: best for design-led firms with a marketer
- Best for: Firms with an in-house marketer or designer who wants pixel-level control without managing hosting.
- Price: Webflow's pricing page lists Basic at $15/mo billed yearly ($25 billed monthly) with 300 static pages and no CMS. Premium is $25/mo billed yearly ($39 billed monthly) and adds the CMS with 20,000 CMS items, 40 Collections and 50 GB of bandwidth. Prices are per site, in USD, plus taxes.
Webflow is a hosted visual builder. Hosting and automatic backups come with the site plan, so there are no plugin updates to run. All paid site plans include unlimited form submissions, and Premium adds site search and form file uploads, which helps if prospective clients send documents.
Webflow charges separately for team access. Workspace plans such as Core ($19/mo billed yearly) and Growth ($49/mo billed yearly) add staging sites and collaboration tools, and the free Starter Workspace includes one full seat.
Where it falls short:
- The CMS caps items per plan. A large firm with thousands of blog posts and location pages needs to plan around the limit.
- Extra bandwidth on Premium is a paid add-on (for example, +50 GB for $20/mo billed annually).
- Webflow's pricing page notes that code export does not include dynamic CMS content. Plan your exit before you build.
Our take: Webflow is a strong choice if a designer will own the site day to day. For a side-by-side view, read WordPress vs Webflow for law firms.
3. Justia Elevate: best legal-specific build with a directory boost
- Best for: Small and mid-size firms that want a lawyer-focused vendor to build and host a WordPress site.
- Price: Justia's website page says law firm websites start at $82.50/month when paid annually. Its price calculator asks for the number of lawyers (1 to 12) and shows pricing after you submit contact details.
Justia says its Elevate websites are "powered by our tailored WordPress platform." The page lists the Justia AI Writer for drafting pages, a built-in AI chatbot called Justia Chat that collects case details, contact form and call-tracking integrations, schema markup and a free SSL certificate. Justia also says the sites are designed to meet WCAG accessibility guidelines.
The other draw is reach. Justia's lawyer directory page offers free profiles for licensed attorneys, and profiles also appear in the Legal Information Institute (LII) directory. Paid Platinum and Gold placements are available.
Where it falls short:
- The starting price is for a paid-annually plan. Your actual price depends on firm size and is shown only after you share contact details.
- The page does not state who owns the design or what happens to the site if you cancel. Ask before you sign.
Our take: Justia is the most transparent of the legal-specific vendors on price, and the WordPress base is a plus. Get the exit terms in writing.
4. LawLytics: best AI-assisted platform for solo and small firms
- Best for: Solo lawyers and small firms that want to manage their own content with AI help.
- Price: LawLytics pricing lists Starter at $99/mo (month-to-month only, up to 10 pages) and Growth at $249/mo billed annually (up to 100 pages). Pro ($499/mo billed annually, up to 1,000 pages) is open only to legacy members for now, and Elite ($1,249/mo billed annually) is waitlist only. Moving an existing site has an import fee starting at $449, waived during the trial and for 90 days after.
On Starter and Growth, the pricing page says "AI executes with your approval," so the platform drafts and you sign off. There is a free trial, and the import fee is waived if you move your site during it.
Read the LawLytics terms before you commit. They say you retain ownership of the content you submit, and LawLytics assigns you its rights in AI output generated for you. But LawLytics retains rights in the Services, which the terms say include designs. You may export your content for 30 days after your account ends. Subscriptions auto-renew, and you must cancel at least five business days before the billing cycle ends.
Where it falls short:
- Page caps are tight on Starter. A firm with several practice areas will outgrow 10 pages quickly.
- You can take your content but not the design.
- Growth requires a one-year commitment.
Our take: A sensible pick for a solo lawyer who wants to write and publish without a developer. Plan your page count before choosing a tier.
5. Squarespace: best for a fast, clean solo site
- Best for: Solo practitioners who need a professional site in a weekend.
- Price: Squarespace pricing lists Basic at $19/mo billed annually ($25 monthly), Core at $29/mo ($39 monthly), Plus at $49/mo ($65 monthly) and Advanced at $99/mo ($139 monthly). All plans include unlimited bandwidth and SSL. Annual plans include a free custom domain for the first year.
Squarespace templates look polished with little effort, and hosting and security are handled for you. For a lawyer with a handful of practice areas, a bio and a contact form, it covers the basics.
Where it falls short:
- Basic allows only two contributors and omits code injection, which limits adding third-party scripts such as call tracking. Core removes both limits.
- It is not built for hundreds of location and practice-area pages.
- Moving a large site off Squarespace later takes manual work.
Our take: Fine for a new solo practice. Choose Core over Basic if you plan to add intake or tracking scripts.
6. JurisPage by Juris Digital: best for growing firms that want local SEO bundled
- Best for: Firms early in their growth that want design, SEO and listings handled together.
- Price: Not published. The JurisPage page says there is "No upfront setup fee" and that scope scales with the number of attorneys and market size.
JurisPage is Juris Digital's website platform for smaller firms. The page lists brand design, a StoryBrand website, SEO and Google Business Profile, Yelp and Apple Maps setup, with launch within 45 days. Most importantly for a law firm, it states: "You own your site, your content, and all IP we create, always."
Where it falls short:
- JurisPage has a 24-month term. The page says that term is what lets it skip the setup fee.
- No published price makes comparison harder.
Our take: The written ownership promise is the best we saw from a managed legal vendor. Weigh it against the two-year term.
7. Scorpion and FindLaw: best for firms buying a full marketing program
- Best for: Firms that want one vendor for the website, ads, intake and reporting, and have budget for a managed program.
- Price: Neither publishes prices or contract terms. Both quote after a consultation.
Scorpion's legal page bundles websites with SEO, paid ads, reputation management and an AI intake tool it calls Convert AI, which answers calls and books consultations. It describes itself as "Google's largest LSA partner" and says Clio names it the "sole preferred marketing provider." Each firm gets a dedicated account manager.
FindLaw's website packages come in three programs (Website 100, 200 and 300), described as "fully managed and optimized by our legal marketing experts."
Where it falls short:
- Neither page states who owns the website, the content or the ad accounts.
- No public pricing, so you cannot compare without a sales call.
Our take: Consider these only if you want a fully managed program. Ask for ownership, domain and exit terms in the contract, and see our list of law firm marketing contract red flags.
8. Wix: best for a very small DIY budget
- Best for: A solo lawyer building the first site alone.
- Price: Light, Core, Business and Business Elite plans are listed on the Wix plans page. Wix shows prices by region (our check returned non-US pricing), so confirm the US price there before you buy.
Wix includes hosting, a drag-and-drop editor and a 14-day money-back guarantee. Core and higher plans add scheduling, which can work for consultation booking.
Where it falls short:
- Light includes only 2 GB of storage and two site collaborators.
- Large content libraries and complex intake flows are harder to manage than on WordPress.
Our take: Workable for a starter site. If you expect to grow, keep your content in documents you control so a later move is easier.
How to choose
- Choose WordPress if you plan to publish many practice-area, location and blog pages, and you want to own everything.
- Choose Webflow if a designer or marketer will run the site and you are happy with hosted, per-site pricing.
- Choose Justia Elevate if you want a legal-specific vendor, a WordPress base and a free directory profile in one place.
- Choose LawLytics if you are a solo or small firm that wants to write content yourself with AI help on a monthly plan.
- Choose Squarespace or Wix if you need a simple site now and have fewer than 20 pages.
- Choose a managed vendor (JurisPage, Scorpion, FindLaw) only after you read the ownership and exit clauses.
Whatever you pick, check it against our law firm website must-haves and budget with our law firm website platform costs guide. If you want a team to build or rebuild the site, see our law firm website services.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best website platform for a small law firm?
For most small firms, self-hosted WordPress on managed hosting is the best balance of cost, control and growth. If you want a done-for-you option, Justia Elevate builds on WordPress and publishes a starting price. A solo lawyer with a small site can start on Squarespace.
Do legal-specific website vendors work better than general builders?
They save time, because they know practice-area content and intake. The trade-off is contract terms. Some publish prices and ownership promises, and some do not. Compare the exit terms before features.
Who owns my law firm website if I use a vendor?
It depends on the contract. JurisPage says you own your site, content and IP. LawLytics's terms say you own your content but LawLytics keeps rights in designs. Scorpion and FindLaw do not state ownership on their public pages, so ask in writing.
Does my website count as lawyer advertising?
Yes. The ABA's Model Rule 7.1 covers all communications about a lawyer's services, and Rule 7.2 requires the name and contact details of a responsible lawyer or firm. State rules vary, so check your state bar. Our guide to law firm website disclaimers and forms covers the common pieces.
How much does a law firm website platform cost per month?
Entry-level published prices we checked run from $15/mo (Webflow Basic, billed yearly) to $99/mo (LawLytics Starter, month-to-month). Plans with more pages or a CMS cost more, such as LawLytics Growth at $249/mo billed annually. Design, content and marketing are extra. See law firm website platform costs for a full breakdown.
