15 questions to ask an agency about funnel content (and red flags)

The best way to vet an agency for funnel content is to ask how it plans, researches, checks, reviews, launches and measures the work, and to listen for specifics. A funnel guide covers TOFU (top of funnel) articles that help readers learn, MOFU (middle of funnel) articles that help them compare, and BOFU (bottom of funnel) pages that help them decide. A good provider can explain how each article is tied to a page that earns you leads, where every fact comes from, and who checks it.

The 15 questions below are grouped by stage of the work, each with what a good answer sounds like. After them come the red flags: guaranteed leads, rankings or AI placement, page counts as the goal, city or keyword swap pages, no sources, no review, fake author profiles and paid "best of" rankings. Any one of these is a reason to keep looking.

How to use these questions

Send the questions in writing before a call, or ask them on the call and take notes. Ask every provider the same ones, so the answers are comparable. Vague answers are information too: Google's own advice on hiring help says "Be careful if a company is secretive or won't clearly explain what they intend to do."

A good answer is specific, names a step or a document you can see, and admits limits. It does not have to match our method word for word. The full method we use is in our TOFU, MOFU and BOFU content strategy guide.

Questions about planning

Question 3 matters most. An article that repeats what your service page already says can compete with it in search. Ask the provider to show you that mapping for a few planned articles.

Questions about research, writing and review

On question 10, Google says "Appropriate use of AI or automation is not against our guidelines," and also that "It is critical to manually factcheck and review all AI-generated content for accuracy and trustworthiness before publishing." What matters is the check, not the tool. Why the review behind question 8 stays with your side, whoever writes, is covered in building funnel content in-house vs hiring an agency.

Questions about launch, measurement and ownership

Question 13 echoes one Google suggests asking: "What kind of results do you expect to see, and in what timeframe? How do you measure your success?" An honest answer separates what the provider controls from what it doesn't. On ownership, have your own attorney review the contract; this is not legal advice. Cost and timing are covered in what a funnel content guide costs and how long it takes.

Red flag: guaranteed leads, rankings or AI placement

Google's page on hiring an SEO is direct: "No one can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google." It adds: "If they guarantee you that their changes will give you first place in search results, find someone else." Its guide to generative AI features says "Indexing and serving aren't guaranteed."

The same applies to AI answers. OpenAI says ads "do not influence ChatGPT's answers," Anthropic says Claude's responses won't "be influenced by advertisers," and Google says it "never accepts money to include or rank sites in our search results." A provider promising a guaranteed place inside an organic AI answer is promising something the platforms say is not for sale. A promise of a fixed number of leads from a fixed number of articles is the same problem. More examples are in GEO agency guarantees and red flags.

Red flag: page counts and city or keyword swaps

A proposal that leads with "100 articles a month" is selling volume. Google's spam policies define scaled content abuse as "when many pages are generated for the primary purpose of manipulating search rankings and not helping users," "no matter how it's created." Doorway abuse examples include "Having multiple domain names or pages targeted at specific regions or cities that funnel users to one page."

Google gives no page count that counts as "scaled." The test is purpose and value. A large guide can be fine if each article answers one real question with its own sources. A set of pages that swaps a city name or keyword into the same text is the pattern to avoid. Big content guides without breaking Google's scaled content policy lists Google's warning signs.

Red flag: no sources and no review

If a provider can't show where a claim came from, you can't check it, and neither can your reviewer. This matters most on YMYL topics, which Google's rater guidelines describe as topics that "could significantly impact the health, financial stability, or safety of people." Google's people-first guidance says YMYL content "must be highly accurate and consistent with established expert consensus."

Ask to see a sample research file and a sample fact-check log. If neither exists, it is hard to see how the checking happens. Google also notes: "Ultimately, you are responsible for the actions of any companies you hire."

Red flag: fake author profiles

Content published under an invented expert is meant to look more authoritative than it is. Google's people-first content guidance now says: "Fabricating creator profiles (such as by using AI-generated headshots, made-up names, or false credentials to make content appear as if it was written by human experts) is a form of deception." It adds that deception "is a signal of a low-quality page."

Ask who the bylines will name and how credentials are verified. Real authors and real reviewers, with accurate credentials, are the only safe answer.

Red flag: paid "best of" rankings

Be careful if a provider offers to place your business in a "best of" list it controls or sells. An example in the FTC's Endorsement Guides (16 CFR 255.4, Example 3) describes a review site that "accepts money from manufacturers in exchange for higher rankings" and says such paid-for rankings are deceptive. A disclosure of the payments "would be inadequate because the payments actually determine the headphones' relative rankings." The FTC's consumer reviews rule (16 CFR 465.6) also addresses a business misrepresenting that a website it controls provides independent reviews or opinions.

Applying these to a particular list is a legal question. This is not legal advice; ask an attorney. Fair, sourced comparison content is a different thing, covered in comparison and "vs" pages done right.

Conclusion

A good funnel content provider answers in specifics: how it plans from your inventory, where facts come from, who checks them, who reviews, what happens at launch and how results are measured. It promises the work, not the outcome. If you want to see how we answer these questions, see our content marketing services. For the broader AI-search version of this list, read 21 questions to ask a GEO agency. More guides are in our GEO and AEO Guide.

Frequently asked questions